In a new twist to an ever changing saga that pits County Executive Chris Ronayne and Cleveland Mayor Justin Bibb on one hand against HSG on the other, the Cleveland Browns’ proposed $3.4 billion domed stadium and mixed-use development in Brook Park advanced further as Ohio Senate leaders announced a plan to allocate $600 million toward the project. Unlike the Ohio House’s proposal, which used state-backed bonds, the Senate plan taps into Ohio’s $3.7 billion in unclaimed funds. Of that, $1.7 billion would establish a new Sports and Culture Facilities Fund, from which the Browns would receive a $600 million “performance grant” to be repaid over 16 years through tax revenues generated by the development. To safeguard the state’s investment, the Haslam Sports Group (HSG), owners of the Browns, would place $50 million in escrow.
HSG’s plan includes a $2.4 billion domed stadium and $1 billion in surrounding infrastructure. While HSG has pledged over $2 billion in private capital, it is seeking public support for the remaining funding. In addition to state funds, HSG proposed $600 million in bonds from Brook Park and Cuyahoga County, to be financed through local taxes. However, County Executive Chris Ronayne has rejected the plan, calling it risky and financially irresponsible. HSG has stated it is prepared to move forward without the county’s involvement, intensifying tensions over the project’s funding and public benefit.
Also Read: Cleveland Browns Brook Park Domed Stadium To Proceed Without County Support
The dispute over the Cleveland Browns’ proposed Brook Park domed stadium centers on conflicting visions for the team’s future home and its public funding. The Haslam Sports Group (HSG), which owns the Browns, plans a $3.4 billion stadium and mixed-use development, backed by over $2 billion in private investment. However, it seeks $600 million in state support and another $600 million from local governments, including Cuyahoga County.
County Executive Chris Ronayne and Cleveland Mayor Justin Bibb oppose the Brook Park plan, favoring a downtown renovation of the current stadium with $350 million in state funding. Ronayne has criticized the Brook Park project as a “risky bet,” while HSG insists the new domed stadium would provide greater year-round economic benefits and long-term viability.
Tensions escalated when HSG announced it would proceed without county support, accusing Ronayne of spreading misleading information. Meanwhile, the group has garnered backing from NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and is actively lobbying state lawmakers. The Ohio Senate is deliberating the funding proposal, with a final decision expected by June 30. The standoff highlights a broader debate over public versus private investment, economic impact, and the future location of the Browns’ stadium.
