Georgia’s Proposed $3.5B Eatonton 379 Data Center Campus Targets 2031 Opening

Home » Buildings » Data Center » Georgia’s Proposed $3.5B Eatonton 379 Data Center Campus Targets 2031 Opening
Georgia's Proposed $3.5B Eatonton 379 Data Center Campus Targets 2031 Opening

A proposed 3.5-million-square-foot data center campus in Putnam County, Georgia, could bring up to 520 megawatts of electrical demand to a 542-acre site near Eatonton, but the development faces a local permitting process complicated by a countywide moratorium on data center projects.

Eatonton 379, LLC filed a Development of Regional Impact application with the Georgia Department of Community Affairs on October 26, outlining plans for as many as 11 data center buildings, supporting substations and potential on-site power generation. The application lists 2031 as the anticipated completion year and estimates the development’s value at build-out at approximately $3.5 billion.

The proposal would occupy largely undeveloped land along Glenwood Springs Road in unincorporated Putnam County, southeast of Atlanta. The application identifies a site of approximately 542 acres, although the ultimate development footprint and construction schedule remain subject to local approvals.

A 520 MW campus with unresolved power arrangements

The proposed campus would have an estimated peak connected electrical load of 520 MW, placing it among the larger data center developments recently proposed in Georgia. However, the application does not identify a confirmed end user or data center operator, nor does it establish how much of the proposed electrical capacity would serve computing equipment rather than cooling and other building systems.

The filing names Tri-County EMC and Georgia Power as potential electricity suppliers. It also indicates that the developer expects to include substations and work with the City of Eatonton to address possible on-site generation requirements.

These disclosures outline the project’s anticipated power infrastructure but do not establish that either utility has committed to serve the campus. The filing also does not specify a generation technology, the capacity of any on-site power plant or a schedule for delivering electricity to the site.

That distinction matters for a development of this scale. The 520 MW figure represents estimated peak connected demand, not confirmed utility capacity or a commitment that the campus will have that amount of power available when it opens.

County moratorium complicates the development timeline

The project enters the review process as Putnam County considers new restrictions on data centers and other energy-intensive developments.

On October 21, the Putnam County Board of Commissioners extended a moratorium on permits for data centers, battery energy storage systems and solar energy projects through November 17, 2026. The county initially enacted the moratorium in August while seeking public input on proposed regulations governing these uses.

Eatonton 379’s application identifies rezoning and a conditional use as requested local actions. The state-level Development of Regional Impact process allows regional authorities to assess the potential effects of major developments, but it does not replace the county’s zoning decisions or grant construction approval.

The county has also circulated a proposed Chapter 53 ordinance addressing energy creation, energy storage and digital infrastructure. The draft includes provisions addressing where data centers could be located, building heights, property-line buffers, noise and cooling systems.

If adopted, those requirements could influence the campus’s design and development conditions. However, the proposed rules should not be treated as final regulations, and the available filings do not establish whether the moratorium prevents the county from processing this particular application.

The county’s upcoming decisions will therefore be important to the project’s schedule. The 2031 completion target remains a projection rather than a confirmed opening date.

Filing projects tax revenue and more than 100 jobs

The application estimates that the development could generate approximately $37.35 million in annual local tax revenue at build-out and employ more than 100 full-time workers.

Those figures offer an indication of the economic benefits the applicant anticipates, but they are projections rather than guaranteed fiscal returns or confirmed employment commitments. The filing does not provide a detailed construction workforce estimate or a breakdown of the expected permanent jobs.

The application also identifies the Eatonton-Putnam Water and Sewer Authority as the proposed water and wastewater provider. It estimates daily water demand at 75,000 gallons and wastewater flow at 70,000 gallons.

Those figures describe the applicant’s projected requirements; they do not independently confirm that the utility has reserved capacity or approved service for the development.

The campus’s ultimate effects on local infrastructure will depend on the final site plan, utility arrangements, construction phasing and conditions imposed during the approval process.

Developer identity and tenants remain unclear

Although Eatonton 379, LLC is the named applicant, the filing does not establish the identity of the ultimate investor, operating company or prospective data center tenant.

The application lists Dial Farm Holdings LLC, HPS Real Estate LLC, David L. Kuhns Jr. and Tarita S. Kuns among the property’s owners. Property ownership, however, does not by itself establish who will finance, build or operate the proposed campus.

The absence of a named tenant also leaves important commercial details unresolved, including the intended computing workloads, leasing strategy and whether construction would proceed in phases as demand develops.

For now, the filing establishes the scale of the proposed development and its preliminary infrastructure requirements, but not a finalized construction or operating plan.

With a potential $3.5 billion build-out, 520 MW of estimated peak electrical demand and a projected 2031 completion, Eatonton 379 represents a significant proposed addition to Georgia’s data center pipeline. Its next milestones will be local land-use decisions, clarification of its power arrangements and further disclosure of the parties responsible for bringing the campus to construction.

The scale of the proposed Georgia development reflects a broader expansion of AI computing infrastructure across the United States. In Abilene, Texas, Crusoe is developing a separate 900 MW AI data center campus for Microsoft alongside its existing infrastructure, which is projected to bring the wider Abilene site to approximately 2.1 GW of capacity. While the Eatonton 379 proposal remains in the approval process, the Abilene development illustrates how rapidly data center projects are growing in size and how dedicated power infrastructure is becoming central to plans for meeting AI computing demand.

Georgia's Proposed $3.5B Eatonton 379 Data Center Campus Targets 2031 Opening

Eatonton 379 Data Center Project: Factsheet

  • Project name: Eatonton 379 Data Center
  • Location: Glenwood Springs Road, unincorporated Putnam County, near Eatonton, Georgia
  • Applicant: Eatonton 379, LLC
  • Site area: Approximately 542 acres
  • Proposed buildings: Up to 11 data center buildings
  • Total proposed floor area: Approximately 3.5 million square feet
  • Estimated peak connected electrical load: Up to 520 MW
  • Estimated value at build-out: Approximately $3.5 billion
  • Potential electricity suppliers: Tri-County EMC or Georgia Power
  • Water and wastewater provider named in filing: Eatonton-Putnam Water and Sewer Authority
  • Projected annual local tax revenue: Approximately $37.35 million
  • Projected permanent employment: More than 100 full-time workers
  • Target completion: 2031
  • Approval status: Proposed; rezoning and conditional use requested
  • Key outstanding issues: Local land-use approvals, utility service commitments, ultimate ownership and operator, and the status of county data center regulations

Source: constructionreviewonline.com All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited.

Featured Posts

Featured Companies

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *